My first furniture.

My chosen equipment is a stool I am currently making in my Furniture Construction class. Before I made the furniture, I tried to incorporate certain ergonomic principles or anthropometric variables in the measurements of the height and width of the stool - only that it was not up to the ISO standards, but to my body's standards. :)

I took into consideration the following anthropometric variables:

1) Lower leg length - vertical distance from the floor to the lowest part of the thigh behind the knee (90 degrees of knee flexion)
2) Hip breadth - maximum horizontal distance across the hips, while sitting down
3) Body depth - horizontal distance from the rear of the knee to the back of the buttock, while sitting down

I measured the height of the stool to about 18 inches plus a cushion of about an inch. The stool is round so the diameter works for both the hip breadth and body depth, which is measured at 17 inches. These measurements are basically based on my body size, allowing me enough space to sit on the cushion and allowing my feet to touch the ground at a comfortable level.

Cradle to Cradle.

This green book is all about "remaking the way we make things." It gives us a different perspective of recycling as opposed to upcycling - if a product does actually become more useful or harmful when it is recycled, or if upcylcing or developing a better product than that which it came from is more effective.

When we create and develop products we must be concerned of its evolution. What happens to a product once the user decides to dispose of it - does it just rot in our environment or does it help sustain our environment? This is where the question of Cradle to Grave or Cradle to Cradle becomes significant. Why not make things that once the user is done utilizing it, they can be thrown on the ground and thus sustain every living organism around it - just like nature. The book compares this relationship to a cherry blossom tree, whose "litter" sustains the soil around it, or a colony of ants - how their way of living is so sustainable that what they take from nature they give back to support the ecosystem. I mean you don't see them having a dumpsite beside every anthill right? Lol. I now have high respect for these creatures. This is apparently how nature works, and unfortunately not how man does.

The book further talks about sustainable design (like a grass roof - and no, not our nipa huts that use dried grass) and how being "less bad' just won't cut it. Here are several quotes to ponder on from the book of William McDonough and Michael Braungart:

Stop being so bad, so materialistic, so greedy. Do whatever you can, no matter how inconvenient, to limit your "consumption." Buy less, spend less, drive less, have fewer children - or none. Aren't the major environmental problems today - global warming, deforestation, pollution, waste - products of your decadent Western way of life?

Many products are designed with "built-in obsolescence," to last only for a certain period of time, to allow - to encourage - the customer to get rid of the thing and buy a new model. (Exactly like the iPod and the MacBooks...)

See the hollowness and fundamental unsatisfactoriness of a life devoted primarily to the pursuit of material ends. (Fritz Schumacher)

Recycling is an aspirin, alleviating a rather large collective hangover... overconsumption. The best way to reduce any environmental impact is not to recycle anymore, but to produce and dispose of less. (Robert Lilienfeld and William Rathje)

You must get the most out of the power, out of the material, and out of the time. (Henry Ford)

Most recycling is actually downcycling; it reduces the quality of a material over time. When plastics other than those found in soda and water bottles are recycled, they are mixed with different plastics to produce a hybrid of lower quality, which is then molded into something amorphous and cheap, such as a park bench or a speed bump. (Why don't we find ways to upcycle instead - remake items with higher quality and usefulness.)

(The pages of this book is actually made of polymers that are infinitely recyclable at the same level of quality, and not made of paper. The inks used as well are nontoxic. A good example of Cradle to Cradle design.) Books become books become books over and over again, each incarnation a sparkling new vehicle for fresh images and ideas. Form follows not just function but the evolution of the medium itself, in the endlessly propagating spirit of the printer world.

Our concept of eco-effectiveness means working on the right things - on the right products and services and systems - instead of making the wrong things less bad (eco-efficiency). The marvelous thing about effective systems is that one wants more of them, not less. (Like a vehicle that emits less pollution vs. a vehicle that does not emit any pollution at all.)

We have been working with a kind of roofing that responds to all of these issues, including the economic ones. It is a light layer of soil, a growing matrix, covered with plants. It maintains the roof at a stable temperature, providing free evaporative cooling in hot weather and insulation in cold weather, and shields it from the sun's destructive rays, making it last longer. In addition, it makes oxygen, sequesters carbon, captures particulates like soot, and absorbs storm water. And that's not all: it looks far more attractive than naked asphalt and, with the storm-water management, saves money that would be lost to regulatory fees and flood damage. In appropriate locales, it can even be engineered to produce solar-generated electricity. If this sounds like a novel idea, it's not. It is based on centuries-old building techniques. In Iceland, for example, many old farms were built wit stones, wood, and sod, and grass for roofs. And it is widely used in Europe, where tens of millions of square feet of such roofing already exist.

There is some talk in science and popular culture about colonizing other planets, such as Mars or the moon. The idea also provides rationalization for destruction, an expression of our hope that we'll find a way to save ourselves if we trash our planet. Let's not make a big mess here and go somewhere less hospitable even if we figure out how. Let's use our ingenuity to stay here; to become, once again, native to this planet.

Design buildings that, like trees, produce more energy than they consume and purify their own waste water. Design factories that produce effluents that are drinking water. Design products that, when their useful life is over, do not become useless waste but can be tossed onto the ground to decompose and become food for plants and animals and nutrients for soil; or, alternately, that can return to industrial cycles to supply high-quality raw materials for new products. Design a world of abundance, not one of limits, pollution, and waste.

Five steps to eco-effectiveness:
Get "free of" known culprits. The detergent may be "free of" phosphates, but have they been replaced by something worse?
Follow informed personal preferences: prefer ecological intelligence, prefer respect, prefer delight, celebration, and fun.
Create a "passive positive" list. What, if any, are their problematic or potentially problematic characteristics? Are they toxic? Carcinogenic? How is the product used, and what is its end state? What are the effects and possible effects on the local and global communities?
Activate the positive list. Stop trying to be less bad and start figuring out how to be good. Now you set out with eco-effective principles, so that the product is designed from beginning to end to become food for either biological or technical metabolisms. (No more substituting harmful ingredients to less harmful ones).
Reinvent. Recast the design assignment: not "design a car" but "design a "nutrivehicle." Don't just reinvent the recipe, rethink the menu.

Signal your intention. Commit to a new paradigm, rather than to an incremental improvement of the old. Restore. Strive for "good growth," not just economic growth. Be read to innovate further. Understand and prepare for the learning curve. And exert intergenerational responsibility.

How can we support and perpetuate the rights of all living things to share in a world of abundance? How can we love the children of all species - not just our own - for all time? Imagine what a world of prosperity and health in the future will look like, and begin designing for it right now. What would it mean to become, once again, native to this place, the Earth - the home of all our relations? This is going to take us all, and it is going to take forever. But then, that's the point.

Bikram Yoga.

Bikram Yoga is yoga in a heated room. This allows muscles and tissues to become more elastic giving you more flexibility and less chance of injury. It also allows you to sweat and detox through the skin. It also improves your circulatory and cardiovascular system plus it provides other health and stamina benefits. For me though I think the most important benefit one can get from it is that it releases great stress from the mind and the body.

Below are 3 Bikram Yoga poses:




1) Dandayamana-Bibhaktapada-Janushirasana COG: the perpendicular line where the torso, head and left knee are located Size and shape of the base: long line from the hands back to the right foot Postural stress: in this position, the stomach is sucked in to create compression of the abdominal organs and to stabilize the spine



2) Dhanurasana COG: the upper torso of the body that pulls on the legs for support Size and shape of the base: square/rectangular shape where the abdomen touches the floor Postural stress: this position opens up the rib cage, stretches the abdominal wall, and gives the spine a 360-degree flexion



3) Tuladandasana COG: on the left leg standing Size and shape of the base: the left foot along with the stretched body that forms a capital "T" Postural stress: to maintain this position, the muscles of the horizontal body must be pulled on separate ends simultaneously as if in a human tug-of-war

(Photos taken from: http://www.bybtoronto.com/m_25.asp)

Anatomy, posture and body mechanics.

Activity 1: Stand with your back and heels against a wall. Now try to bend over as if you were picking something up off the ground just in front of you. What happens and why?

Answer: The further I go down, the more I tend to move forward and lose my balance. As soon as I feel I'm about to fall forward, I put my right foot in front of the other to catch myself from falling. The COG of the body must fall within the base of support (such as the feet) and postural reflexes must exist (like moving a foot forward) so that the total body mass remains balanced. If a person standing leans forward to pick up something from the ground, the pelvis moves rearward to compensate for the forward displacement of the COG of the upper body. But in this example, the wall is preventing the pelvis from making its rearward move. Hence, the body will fall over, unless a foot is placed forward - this will balance the transfer of the COG. Sufficient space around a standing body and room for the feet are therefore needed to avoid loss of balance.

Activity 2: Find a chair and place it with its back against a wall. Lean over the chair and touch your head to the wall - make your back as parallel to the ground as possible. Can you lift the chair and stand up?

Answer: Yes I did, on the first try. It was a medium to heavy-weight chair. Women can do this better than men probably because the COG of a woman's body is lower than that of a man's body. I've read that women have a bigger pelvis area (which allows women to carry a baby when pregnant) thus making her body mass concentrated on the lower portion of her body - as well as her COG. Men on the other hand, have their COG concentrated higher towards the chest area. This therefore makes it harder for them to carry something when their chest is already bent forward.

Activity 3: *I haven't done this because I don't live at my house and therefore don't think I can write on the walls... :)

Answer: The intervertebral discs in our spine have a "viscoelastic" behavior. This means that they deform initially then return rapidly to its original shape when a force is removed - elasticity. They may also become narrow as fluid is expelled and the superior and inferior vertebral bodies move closer together (when compressed), and fluid moves into the disc as the disc space becomes wider (when stretched) - viscosity. These occur as a result of the forces exerted on the spine due to daily normal activities. The shrinkage and expansion of the disc spaces change the measure of a body's stature. This is why some people are taller when they wake up in the morning than when they go to bed at night. According to the book, people are about 1% taller when they wake up and almost 50% of the stature gained is lost in the first half-hour after rising.

{Assignment}

2.a. What is five plus two times six minus three? Answer: 14

2.b. What should you do? Will changing your mind affect your odds of winning the million dollars? Or should you just stick with door number three?
Answer: Eliminating door number 2 just increased my odds of winning because then there is a 50% chance that the door I chose has the million dollars. Door number 1 may have a booby prize or the million dollars, but door number 3 - the door I chose - also has that same possibility of having the booby prize or the million dollars. Since it's a 50-50 situation, choosing whichever door wouldn't really matter. I would choose door number 3 if that's what my instinct tells me, or I would choose door number 1 if I feel that it's a good move to change. For me it's really a matter of in which situation would I feel worse afterwards. Would I feel worse that I lost knowing I stuck by a wrong decision the whole time, or would I feel worse knowing that I had the right decision and then I changed it the last minute? Personally, the latter would probably feel worse.

P.S. After answering I was very intrigued and looked up this paradox. And I was wrong. I knew something had to be wrong. You wouldn't give it as an example or wouldn't even bother to warn us about thinking hard about this one, if it were that simple and obvious. And so I read that this is an example of conditional probability. I didn't get a high grade in my Statistics class back in college so no wonder I did not get this one. It took time for me to understand it and below is the simplest way I can explain it.

Facts:
Let's say that Door 1 - is the $1 million, Door 2 - is the duck, Door 3 - is another duck.
The host will ALWAYS show me ONE wrong door (either Door 2 or Door 3) after I've made my first decision.
Goal:
The question here is do I STAY with my original decision or do I CHANGE it - which of the two has a higher probability for success?

TO STAY A:
I choose Door 1, Host shows me incorrect Door 2 (or 3) so I THINK I have 50-50 chance so I decide to stay - and I win.
TO STAY B:
I choose Door 2, Host shows me incorrect Door 3 so I THINK I have 50-50 chance so I decide to stay - and I lose.
TO STAY C:
I choose Door 3, Host shows me incorrect Door 2 so I THINK I have 50-50 chance so I decide to stay - and I lose.
*STAYING thus has a 1/3 probability for success.

TO CHANGE A:
I choose Door 1, Host shows me incorrect Door 2 (or 3) so I THINK I have 50-50 chance so I decide to change - and I lose (whichever the case because Door 2 and 3 are both incorrect).
TO CHANGE B:
I choose Door 2, Host shows me incorrect Door 3 so I THINK I have 50-50 chance so I decide to change to Door 1 - and I win.
TO CHANGE C:
I choose Door 3, Host shows me incorrect Door 2 so I THINK I have 50-50 chance so I decide to change to Door 1 - and I win.
*CHANGING thus has 2/3 probability of success.

I am but human.

I have committed slips and mistakes in my life, some funny while some completely embarrassing.

One example may be categorized as a Description Error.
I used to work for an I.T. company and I was assigned particularly to the online movie ticketing project (similar to Fandango.com in the U.S.). One of my responsibilities was to do email technical support. It was a stressful day for me and a customer, among many others, emailed regarding a request to unlock his account. A customer who does not claim his/her ticket reservation for 3 consecutive times will have his/her account locked. It can be unlocked only by paying a certain fee.
One customer emailed requesting that his account be unlocked for so and so reasons (I don't remember what they were, since this happened years ago). I forwarded the email to our technical head because he does the unlocking of the accounts. I wrote a note on the email that here's another customer who doesn't want to pay for unlocking his account. I was complaining and sounded really irritated in my email and asked the technical guy what to do with this customer. As soon as I hit the send button, which was real close to the "To:" field, I realized that the email written there was not the technical head's email but the customer's email address! I realized that the same time I hit the button! It was too late! I apparently hit the Reply button and not the Forward button. I was freaking out, and the technical head who was just sitting beside me asked me what the problem was (we communicate via email even if we were just sitting next to each other). I told him what happened and we tried to retrieve the email, but it was just too late. The customer received it already in his inbox.
I was waiting in vain for his reply. I was afraid the issue would be escalated to my boss and I would be in big trouble. A few minutes later, the customer replied. I was so scared to read his email. And then, surprisingly, he wasn't mad! He apologized for making such a request and he said that we were probably really busy and that he hoped we would still reconsider, and added a smiley face. Boy was I relieved!! I replied back to apologize, of course, saying that we will unlock his account as soon as possible. Whew! Everyone in the technical team were just laughing about it afterwards.
This is an example of a description error because the correct action was performed on the wrong object, due to their similarities. Because I was so stressed out that day, I accidentally clicked on the Reply button instead of the Forward button, which were just beside each other and didn't look different to me apparently at that time. I didn't bother to read the email address in the "To:" field either because it looked like an email address anyway, so it probably was the correct one.

Here's a short example of Associative Activation Error. I worked for a hotel back home doing P.R. and Marketing. It was a policy to have phone courtesy regardless of your position. Always answer a phone call with, "Diamond Hotel Philippines, this is Michelle, how may I help you?" they say. It was too long so instead I say, "Diamond Hotel Philippines, how may I help you?" I do this several times a day, 6 days a week. One time the phone rang at home, and guess what I said when I picked up the receiver? You guessed right. It was embarrassingly funny.
This is an example of associative activation error because the ringing of a phone for me was already internally associated to the phrase I use at work. So regardless where I am or where the phone is ringing, I automatically say the same thing.

The most horrible error I've ever done is a Loss-of-Activation type. It is a type of error wherein I simply forgot to do something. I remembered the rest of the action, but I forgot a part of the act. I drove to the mall with a friend in my old car. We parked and I guess we were so much involved in a conversation that we stepped out and manually locked the car, as we always do, at the same time.... and then I completely froze. I realized I left the keys in the ignition! Not only that, I left the car running. Stupid you say?! Well it wasn't the first time it happened to me!! I was so frustrated that it happened to me yet again. My friend and I had to take a cab back home just to get the spare key and come back to the mall again. And my house wasn't even near the area. Ugh! That car lacked all forcing functions. It allows you to lock the car with or without the key, hence allowing the possibility that you leave it inside the car, nor did it make an alarm sound notifying that you left the keys in the ignition. The car that I have now have these forcing functions, so I've never left my keys in the car nor have I left the car running with the keys locked inside.

Revolving Door Phobia.

I've always been indifferent to doors, including the revolving ones.. until years back, when I stumbled upon a very compact automatic revolving door at a Victoria's Secret store in Chicago.

It was my first time to go through an automatic revolving door. I have never encountered one before so I did not know how it worked. I thought it was just an ordinary revolving door, which you push to get through. Anyway, this revolving door was very compact that if a lot of people were going through, you tend to be cramped in a small space while moving. Apparently this happened as I was going through. I was in front while several women were behind me. The door was moving by itself, very slowly so my first instinct was to push on the door to make it go faster. I was feeling claustrophobic so I wanted to get away from that door right away. Unfortunately, the door stopped moving and the girl behind me said in a very rude and sarcastic tone, "you're not supposed to touch it." WELL SORRY!!!!! I didn't even say anything to her, I was just furious. How was I supposed to know that I'm not supposed to touch it!?? There were no signs on the door that said "AUTOMATIC, DO NOT PUSH OR TOUCH!" At that moment I felt stupid for not knowing, but I felt furious as well because that girl did not have to be mean.

Since then I hated automatic revolving doors.

Photo taken from ccne.mofcom.gov.cn.